On January 23, 2025, the United States Supreme Court ruled on McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., granting the Government’s application to stay the injunction of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) initially ordered by the Eastern District of Texas. Despite this order, the CTA is still on hold due to a separate nationwide order issued by a different federal judge in the Eastern District of Texas in Samantha Smith and Robert Means vs. U.S. Department of Treasury, No. 6:24-CV-336 (E.D. Texas 1/7/2025), which stayed the effective date of the CTA reporting rule nationwide while the lawsuit is pending.
In Smith v. U.S., Judge Kernodle found that the CTA was likely unconstitutional as an improper exercise of the commerce clause, the power to regulate foreign commerce and foreign affairs, and the power to tax. Judge Kernodle leans heavily on the decision in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, commenting on the substantial risk of irreparable harm by forcing individuals to comply with a law that is unconstitutional and incur irrecoverable costs to do so. Judge Kernodle concludes that the balance of the equities and public interest are both in favor of the plaintiff; the opinion notes that the “public will not be injured by an injunction temporarily enjoining a law that violates the Constitution.”
On January 24, 2025, FinCEN posted an update on the Beneficial Ownership Information site confirming that the nationwide injunction remains in place. The Supreme Court’s action in McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. applied only to the injunction issued in that case and not to the Smith v. US injunction, or to the broader question of the right of a district court to issue an injunction having nationwide application.
As of publication, the government has not appealed the decision in Smith v. U.S. On the legislative front, the "Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act" (H.R 8147 and S. 4297), which would entirely repeal the CTA, has been revived in the House of Representatives and Senate and may gain traction in the coming days and weeks. Additionally, Scott Bessent may be installed as the new Secretary of the Treasury, and, as such, the priorities of the new administration may play a role in the fate and enforcement of the CTA.
We are continuing to monitor the situation, and will provide further updates when they become available.
- Associate
Miles’s practice centers around assessing, structuring, and negotiating mergers, acquisitions, equity investments, spinoffs, asset purchases, and divestures. Miles also engages with organizations of all sizes in entity ...
- Member
Carolyn’s practice encompasses a wide range of corporate transactional matters, with a focus on mergers and acquisitions, equity investments, and general corporate matters. Carolyn has extensive experience in the ...
- Associate
John represents clients across a wide range of banking, securities, and financial regulatory and supervisory matters. His practice focuses primarily on advising large financial institutions, investment advisers and ...
- Counsel
John brings extensive experience representing clients as senior in-house counsel and as a regulatory and compliance lawyer and provides legal advice on the interpretation and application of laws and regulations to financial ...
- Associate
Evan has experience litigating contractual disputes, construction matters, business torts, director and officer liability claims, and class actions and has litigated cases in both state and federal courts across the country ...
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We help keep our clients up to date in these fast-moving areas and to serve as a thought leader.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Obligations Remain Paused Despite Supreme Court Order
- Developments in National Bank Act (NBA) preemption: Illinois’ Interchange Fee Prohibition Act is held preempted by the NBA; Ninth Circuit to Reconsider NBA Preemption of California’s interest on escrow law
- Fifth Circuit Panel Reinstates District Court’s Nationwide Stay on the CTA
- Fifth Circuit Stays District Court’s Nationwide CTA Injunction; entities once again required to report