For followers of developments related to National Bank Act (NBA) preemption and the United States Supreme Court’s related decision in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., 602 U.S. 205 (2024), the waning days of 2024 proved noteworthy. On December 20, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “District Court”) applied Cantero’s principles for evaluating claims of NBA preemption of state law and granted a preliminary injunction from enforcement of Illinois’s Interchange Fee Prohibition Act (the “IFPA” or, the “Act”) against national banks and federal savings associations. Illinois Bankers Association et. al. v. Raoul, No. 24 C 7307, 202 WL 5186840 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2024). Only a few days later, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Ninth Circuit”) withdrew its August 2024 decision that had affirmed its 2022 decision that the NBA did not preempt California’s interest on escrow (IOE) law, indicating it would schedule oral arguments and requesting supplemental briefing by the parties to address whether the IOE law was preempted “under the standard and methodology” announced in Cantero. Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, No. 21-15667, 2024 WL 5206133 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2024). These developments gave us the first reasoned lower court opinion applying Cantero and set the stage for potentially three circuit courts (the First, Second and Ninth) to explicitly address and apply Cantero in 2025.
Following up on our most recent blog post on developments regarding the enforcement date for the Corporate transparency Act (“CTA”), on December 26, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Panel that will ultimately be handling the merits of the appeal from the District Court issued an order vacating another order by a different Fifth Circuit panel on December 23, 2024 that had stayed the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas’ nationwide injunction on the beneficial ownership reporting obligations under the CTA. The aim of the rapid reversal is to preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties’ weighty substantive arguments.
Following up on our most recent blog post on developments regarding the enforcement date for the CTA, on the afternoon of December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit issued its order staying the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas' nationwide injunction on the beneficial ownership reporting obligations under the CTA.
As a result, the reporting obligations under the CTA are now back in effect except to the extent enjoined for plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.), with all entities existing prior to 2024 and all entities formed in 2024 being required to file. Recognizing that reporting companies may need additional time in light of the injunction previously in effect, FinCEN will require entities existing prior to 2024 and entities formed in September, 2024 who would have had to file during the period when the injunction was in effect to file their initial BOIR before January 13, 2025 (instead of before January 1, 2025 as originally required). Entities formed on or after December 3, 2024, which would have had to file within 90 days of formation have an additional 21 days to file (111 days in total in which to file). See https://www.fincen.gov/boi for the full update.
We are continuing to monitor the situation, and will provide further updates when they become available.
As discussed in our prior blog post, on December 3, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“District Court”) issued an order preliminarily enjoining enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and the associated beneficial ownership information reporting rules (the “CTA”) nationwide (the “preliminary injunction”).
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) is everywhere you look right now. AI is a lot of things, but for most of the market it is simultaneously a buzzword for innovation and efficiency, and a bogeyman for fraud and privacy concerns. As such, AI is a technology that banking and markets regulators, like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) are watching closely. On December 5, 2024, the CFTC issued a staff advisory (the “Advisory”) regarding the use of AI in CFTC-regulated markets.
On December 3, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (“Court”) entered a sweeping order enjoining enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and the associated beneficial ownership information reporting rules (the “CTA”) nationwide. The immediate effect: notwithstanding the CTA’s stated reporting deadline of December 31, 2024, no entity is currently required to file with the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) information about itself, its owners or the persons otherwise controlling the entity.
On October 21, 2024, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) finalized revisions to its Guidelines Establishing Standards for Recovery Planning by Certain Large Insured National Banks, Insured Federal Savings Associations, and Insured Federal Branches at 12 CFR Part 30, Appendix E (Revised Guidelines). The Revised Guidelines continue the regulatory trend following the 2023 bank failures of lowering the threshold at which financial institutions become subject to requirements aimed at promoting their resiliency—in this case, from $250 billion to $100 billion in average consolidated assets (Covered Banks). This will result in Covered Banks in the $100 billion to under $250 billion range having to develop and annually review recovery plans for the first time since 2018. Moreover, all Covered Banks will be subject to new requirements to test their plans and incorporate non-financial risk, with standards that differ from those applicable to resolution plans under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) recently finalized rule for insured depository institutions (IDI Rule) and Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act (165(d) Plans). As a result, Covered Banks of all sizes will need to reexamine and update their recovery planning processes. These changes are effective as of January 1, 2025, and are subject to staggered compliance dates.
With the amount of commercial real estate loans scheduled for maturity over the next several years expected to increase significantly, there is accompanying heightened risk that some borrowers may be unable to replace their maturing debt with new debt under reasonable terms and prevailing market conditions (refinance risk). On October 3, 2024, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) issued OCC Bulletin 2024-29, which provides guidance to banks in the management of credit risk associated with refinancing commercial loans. The bulletin, which applies to all banks with commercial loan portfolios, outlines that refinance risk affects both individual loan transactions and loan portfolios and can be driven by both external and borrower-specific factors. The bulletin highlights the need for banks to have related risk management processes that are appropriate for their size, complexity, risk profile and loan types.
On October 22, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) finalized its personal financial data rights rule (“The Final 1033 Rule” or the “Final Rule”) that would require data providers to make available to consumers and their authorized third parties certain covered data in the data provider’s control or possession concerning a covered consumer financial product or service. This Final Rule comes a year after the CFPB initially proposed the rule (the “Proposed Rule”) in October of 2023.
On October 2, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced it had settled enforcement proceedings against Thrivent Investment Management, Inc. (“Thrivent”), a SEC dually-registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, stemming from Thrivent’s alleged failure to update a calculator tool utilized by its representatives to determine which shares in certain 529 College Savings Plans are recommended to its retail customers.
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We help keep our clients up to date in these fast-moving areas and to serve as a thought leader.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- Developments in National Bank Act (NBA) preemption: Illinois’ Interchange Fee Prohibition Act is held preempted by the NBA; Ninth Circuit to Reconsider NBA Preemption of California’s interest on escrow law
- Fifth Circuit Panel Reinstates District Court’s Nationwide Stay on the CTA
- Fifth Circuit Stays District Court’s Nationwide CTA Injunction; entities once again required to report
- Nationwide CTA Injunction Remains in Place Following First FinCEN Stay Request; Second FinCEN Stay Request Pending Before Fifth Circuit