Moore & Van Allen (MVA) Litigation Member Tanisha Palvia and Associate Alli Davidson discuss the Supreme Court decision on the intent standard for False Claims Act violations and explore its implications in their article titled, “SCOTUS clarifies intent requirement for False Claims Act cases” which was published by Westlaw and Reuters on July 6.
Related Materials
SCOTUS clarifies intent requirement for False Claims Act cases
MemberTanisha represents individuals and corporations facing white collar criminal prosecutions and governmental enforcement actions. She also manages and conducts internal investigations for various organizations, including ...
About MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
As government authorities around the world conduct overlapping investigations and bring parallel proceedings in evolving regulatory environments, companies face challenging regulatory and criminal enforcement dynamics. We help keep our clients up to date in these fast-moving areas and to serve as a thought leader.
The latest from MVA White Collar Defense, Investigations, and Regulatory Advice Blog
- CTA Reporting Relief: FinCEN Interim Rule Exempts US Companies from Reporting Beneficial Ownership & Foreign Companies from Reporting Information Regarding US Owners
- CTA Filing Obligations Back On
- Corporate Transparency Act Reporting Obligations Remain Paused Despite Supreme Court Order
- Developments in National Bank Act (NBA) preemption: Illinois’ Interchange Fee Prohibition Act is held preempted by the NBA; Ninth Circuit to Reconsider NBA Preemption of California’s interest on escrow law